The conference proceedings were listed in the Thomson Reuters ISI Index to Social Sciences & Humanities Proceedings (ISSHP) and/or the Thomson Reuters ISI Index to Social Sciences & Humanities Proceedings (ISSHP/ISI Proceedings) in previous years. We also intend to send the 2025 proceedings to Thomson Reuters for evaluation.

Instructions for Authors

All papers should be prepared according to guidelines in the paper template (MS Word, LaTeX). The paper should be 6-8 pages long and written in English. All formatting and typesetting details are provided in the paper template document.

All papers are submitted to a double-blind peer review process before publication. Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the papers will be published in the conference proceedings. Please, send your full or revised papers to the e-mail: .

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

SMSIS’s Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement is based, in large part, on the guidelines and standards developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

We expect all parties commit themselves to these publication ethics. We do not tolerate any plagiarism or other unethical behaviour. We will remove any manuscript that does not meet these standards.

If any author or reviewer encounters a potential breach of publication ethics, we encourage them to inform and contact organization committee as soon as possible.

The relevant duties and expectations of editors, reviewers, and authors are listed below.

Responsibilities

Author

The Author must certify that his/her submitted manuscripts are his/her original work.
The Author must certify that the submitted manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The Author must certify that the submitted manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
The Author must identify all sources used in the creation of the submitted manuscript.
The Author must notify organization committee of any conflicts of interest.
The Author must report any errors they discover in the submitted manuscript.

Editorial Board

The Editorial Board must evaluate manuscripts only for their intellectual content.
The Editorial Board must keep all information related to submitted manuscripts confidential.
The Editorial Board must disclose any conflicts of interest.
The Editorial Board is responsible for making publication decisions for submitted manuscripts.

Reviewer

The Reviewer must notify to organization committee if there is any conflicts of interest.
The Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in the submitted manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify organization committee and excuse himself/herself from the review process.
The Reviewer must keep all information related to submitted manuscript confidential.
The Reviewer must alert the Editor-in-Chief to any information that may be reason to reject publication of submitted manuscript.
The Reviewer must always evaluate the submitted manuscript only for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author.